Pit Bull, in its letter, states that it is collecting a debt on behalf of the department store (the same one that earlier told reports credit Parkersburg Consumer A not to worry about it, that they would take care of reports credit Parkersburg it and delete it fromhis credit report.) Pit Bull shows the debt now as , having tacked on a penalty and a default charge or attorneys fees), but informs Consumer A that, although he owes immediately the full amount of , they will take as a full payment. They cant guarantee Consumer A that the department store will reinstate him in good graces vis-à-vis his credit card (the one that was neer his in the first place) but if he reports credit Parkersburg pays them the at least they will stop dunning him. The account number on the letter is now 123DEPTSTRE890.
A few months later Pit Bull furnishes the account 1234567890 as 123DEPTSTRE890 to the CRAs, showing the account as a charge off, amount , and a note that the trade line will be reported for the next seven years! He reports credit Parkersburg calls the department store and reiterates his story that the department store had reports credit Parkersburg earlier investigated, agreed with him that he did not owe the debt and that they would take care of it for him. credit report watch These words come back to haunt Consumer An as the representative now tells him that they are sorry, the account is now with reports credit Parkersburg collections, and that they cannot interfere as it is now out of their hands. Consumer An also tries to clarify the situation with Pit Bull but, other than being cursed at and told to pay the damn bill, he gets nowhere. He disputes with the CRAs with certified letters, giving a full account of the situation and a statement that he categorically does not, and never did, owe the debt. Two of the three CRAs shortly thereafter delete the trade line from Consumer As report, but one of them does not. That one informs our consumer that they checked with the furnisher (Pit Bull) reports credit Parkersburg and the furnisher verified with them that the information they provided on the reports credit Parkersburg debt was valid. free credit reports annual
Some more months reports credit Parkersburg crack and Consumer A starts feeling frenzied. He tries to get refinancing on his home but is stated hell have to open up the derogative trade reports credit Parkersburg line exhibiting on one of his credit reports as a first step.
He is likewise denied credit on a couple occasions which he suspects resulted from reports credit Parkersburg the same disparaging describing. Consumer A starts religiously checking his credit report, and discovers that now the account is being furnished by another collection company, Viper, Inc., and the account number has changed again, this time to 732******. Our consumer becomes by this point very discouraged. but they are just as nasty and, if anything, more venomous than reports credit Parkersburg Pit Bull. At this point Consumer A finds an attorney firm that will reports credit Parkersburg take his case and initiate a lawsuit on his behalf. Among other things, the Complaint accuses the remaining CRA of a reinsertion violation. What the CRA had done in this example was willfully reports credit Parkersburg and negligently violated the reinsertion requirements of 15 U.S.C. Section 1681i(a)(5)(B) in reinserting derogatory information onto plaintiffs credit report after he had previously disputed it, without certification reports credit Parkersburg or notice. free credit report check (Even though the account reports credit Parkersburg totalled maintaining changing, it was still the same account being referred to all along. The CRA in oppugned deleted, then reports credit Parkersburg reinserted the same account without notifying Consumer A, a no-no.) After the account is deleted and then reinserted, the CRA fails to notify Consumer A within 5 business days that they are re-inserting the account information. The ironic twist to all this is that the CRA then argues that the reinsertion of the account was not their fault because it had a different account number, and how are they supposed to know that it was the same account?
ليست هناك تعليقات:
إرسال تعليق